An execution layer for creator deals: one signed campaign paper and USDC escrow on Base, released when the post goes live.
Tallyvox
Counts how often AI assistants name your company across six engines, then works on closing the gap.
https://tallyvox.com
Showing the product's mark because a screenshot isn't available yet. Own this product? Suggest a screenshot.
What It Does
Tallyvox measures a thing no analytics dashboard reports: whether an AI names you when a buyer asks who to hire. It reads your site, generates the real questions buyers, partners, investors and candidates actually ask, and runs them through the AI engines dozens of times each — because a single answer is noise — then counts exactly who gets recommended, with confidence intervals on the result.
The engines covered are ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. The diagnosis the site makes is that the same three names keep coming back across every question type because those companies hold the sources the engines already trust, and asking again tomorrow only shuffles the order. Miss the sources and you miss every version of the answer.
Where most AEO tooling stops at a screenshot, Tallyvox publishes the frequencies, a leaderboard, method documentation and auditable case studies rather than a single anecdote, and then positions the follow-up work — going to get you counted. A six-page scan is free, with pricing for the ongoing work.
Key Features
- Repeated runs across six engines including Google AI Overviews and AI Mode
- Questions generated from your own site and from real buyer, partner, investor and talent intents
- Named-entity counts with confidence intervals rather than single screenshots
- Public method documentation and auditable case studies
- Category leaderboard showing who the engines name
- Free six-page scan before a paid engagement
Who It Is For
Companies whose buyers now ask an assistant who to use, and marketers who need a number rather than a screenshot for AI visibility.
Key Use Cases
Measuring how often ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity recommend you versus competitors; finding which sources the engines trust in your category; tracking AI visibility movement over repeated runs; auditing a claimed AEO result against published frequencies.
Pricing and Access
Pricing
Freemium
Plans
| Plan | Price | Billing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Audit | $500 | one-time | One-off core audit |
| Monitor | $1,000 | per month | Retainer: 4 scans/mo + delta + 3 pursuits |
| Build | $2,500 | per month | Retainer: 4 scans/mo + citation outreach + content |
| Dominate | $4,000 | per month | Retainer: 6 scans/mo + editorial PR + watch |
Plan details are shown as published; taxes and regional pricing may differ.
Access
Starts with a free six-page scan requested from the site; ongoing measurement and the work of improving the count are priced on the pricing page.
Pricing and availability last checked: Oct 24, 2026 · Source: official website
Privacy and Data Handling
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths
Reporting frequencies with confidence intervals over dozens of runs is the only honest way to measure assistant answers, and publishing the method makes the number checkable.
Limitations
The measurement covers the six engines the site names, not every assistant a buyer might use.
Related Products
A customer-finding assistant that surfaces public conversations asking about your problem and drafts replies you post yourself.
A creator workspace for X that turns rough notes into drafts, schedules them, and draws milestone share cards.
An X reply assistant that surfaces timely posts worth answering and helps shape a useful reply in your own voice.